‘… “AI-driven content could lead to a loss of control over information accuracy and an increase in misinformation if not properly managed.”’
SINCE its development in the last 10 years, artificial intelligence (AI) has gone a long way into being an indispensable tool of modern life. ChatGPT, the form of AI that has become useful in research and other tasks connected with reports, analyses, and writing in general, has become commonplace in the academic, media, and legal professions.
This development necessarily elicited serious concern among leaders in these fields.
Recently, Chief Justice Alexander G. Gesmundo emphasized the potential of artificial intelligence in assisting judges while underscoring the importance of preserving the human elements of justice, during his presentation at the 19th Conference of Chief Justices of Asia and the Pacific in Kuala Lumpur.
Speaking on the regulation of the legal profession in the era of AI, Gesmundo highlighted both opportunities and challenges the technology presents to improve judicial efficiency.
He noted AI’s ability to streamline administrative tasks, expedite legal research, and even predict judicial outcomes, citing examples from foreign courts where AI assists in examining evidence and preparing case files. However, the Philippines’ top magistrate cautioned against over-reliance on AI, stressing that while AI can improve processes, it lacks critical human qualities such as empathy, ethical discretion, and adaptability to societal changes.
“Courts should still be populated with human judges if we are to expect that empathy and compassion would still go into the consideration of granting equitable remedies,” he said.
Gesmundo concluded by reaffirming the judiciary’s responsibility to ensure AI remains a tool for efficiency without compromising the integrity and human-centered nature of justice. This policy is emphasized in the Philippine Supreme Court’s Strategic Plan for Judicial Innovations 2022-2027 (SPJI) which integrates AI-driven programs aimed at enhancing court efficiency and access to justice.
Interestingly, the same concern was aired in a report by the Xinhua Institute and presented at the Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation in Beijing last week. The report highlights the importance of embracing technological progress without losing sight of core journalistic principles.
“Media organizations should embrace the technological progress brought by AI, but always put people at the center,” the report said.
Amid AI’s growing influence, the report emphasizes that media outlets must prioritize human-centric values while using AI to enhance journalistic standards.
The report urges that AI be used to improve news production and distribution while safeguarding accuracy, fairness, and trust. It also warns of potential risks, noting: “AI-driven content could lead to a loss of control over information accuracy and an increase in misinformation if not properly managed.”
It stresses the need for robust systems to ensure the ethical use of AI tools, underscoring that “humans must ultimately be responsible for the editorial process.”
“AI is a tool, but journalism’s mission to serve the public and uphold the truth must remain unchanged,” it added.
We are confident that leaders of the news media and the legal profession throughout the world will appreciate these gentle reminders about committing to a “people-first” approach in the era of artificial intelligence.
