Brand faces sex assault accusation

- Advertisement -

By Steve Gorman

British actor-comedian Russell Brand was accused in a lawsuit filed on Friday of sexually assaulting a film extra on the New York City set of the 2011 romantic comedy “Arthur,” in which he starred as a boozing, philandering heir to a fortune.

The suit follows a recent flurry of allegations reported in the British news media against the 48-year-old performer by several women accusing him of sexual assault and inappropriate behavior, some dating back 20 years.

- Advertisement -

British police have said they were investigating a number of the allegations, but the New York lawsuit filed on Friday marks the first such accusation leveled in court.

It was brought in state court under New York’s Adult Survivors Act, which gives accusers a one-year window to sue over alleged sexual abuse from a long time ago, even if statutes of limitations have expired.

Warner Bros Pictures, which distributed “Arthur,” also was named as a defendant, along with other companies involved in the film production. They were accused of negligence and of aiding and abetting Brand by tolerating his misconduct on the set.\

The complaint was brought by a woman identified only as Jane Doe who said she was hired to appear as a cast “extra” in a scene from “Arthur” filmed at Le Cirque restaurant in Manhattan in July of 2010.

According to the lawsuit, Brand was visibly intoxicated during the production and exposed his genitalia to the plaintiff as he sat at a table staring at her, “openly and obviously in the presence of everyone on set,” including film studio employees who treated his behavior as acceptable.

Afterward, the complaint alleges, Brand followed the woman into a restroom, where he again pulled down his pants, then shoved her into a stall and forced her to perform oral sex on him, all while a production crew member stood directly outside as if to guard the door.

The accuser says the assault caused “severe psychological injuries” and economic losses.

The suit seeks unspecified money damages from Brand on grounds of assault, battery, false imprisonment and infliction of emotional distress.

Author

- Advertisement -

Share post: