China to finish year with higher growth


    The macroeconomic data from China has been surprisingly positive lately, particularly that the private manufacturing sector signals progress, which was quite unexpected.

    The Caixin manufacturing PMI, that primarily covers the private sector, showed an increase to 51.8 in November, which in fact, is the highest reading during the past three years.

    If one study the annual change in China’s industrial production the expectation of progress expressed in the PMI surveys has not yet materialized in real progress.

    I trust there will be a clear expectation in the financial markets about an increase of at least five percent when the data for November is published on Monday the 16th November.

    Though this development is worth a consideration, or even should make one wonder, as the US-China trade war was not resolved when the PMI surveys were done, then the growing optimism in China’s business world may seem surprising.

    Given the pressure on the GDP growth in the third quarter this year, I have been very excited about what initiatives the Chinese central government will come up with.

    It’s fair to mention that this challenge is certainly not an isolated Chinese issue, as growth shrinks around the world, though it doesn’t give solace to the Chinese central government, so it has to select its action.

    The cement production in China has gone up from 210 Mio. tonnes in June to 218 million tons in October, despite declining housing prices during the same period.

    How surprisingly strong the demand for cement is can be illustrated by the price increases for construction materials.

    The rumors say that the price for cement has gone up about 15 percent during the past three months, and the price on steel bars used for construction is also up.

    Obviously, there is something going on in the construction sector, but in the national accounts, any increase in public infrastructure investments are not visible yet.

    Very interestingly, the provinces have been allowed to issue debt from the 2020 borrowing facilities that are meant for infrastructure investments in toll roads, ports, railways, etc.

    All-in-all, I argue that it seems very plausible that the central government in Beijing has, as a first step to support the growth during this quarter, returned to the good old adage of “building more infrastructure”.

    The infrastructure solution is one of the least attractive options as macroeconomic support because China is running out of healthy infrastructure projects to build. It means that infrastructure spending increasingly risks to return a negative yield, which is the economic expression for an unattractive public investment that should be avoided.

    These kinds of investments just keep the economy running, but do not develop or move the economy forward.

    Though Beijing can still manage to introduce new reforms, where I am watching out for any kind of tax reform aimed at the private households. I trust that the Chinese government is sensible enough to work in that direction as well.

    In my view, the initiatives will also have a direct effect on the Chinese stock market, where I very often get the question, how much will the Chinese stock market jump if the US-China trade war comes to an end?

    It, of course, depends on many factors, but right now, I judge that it will jump seven percent more than the global stock market if the trade war truly ended, and the current slim “phase 1” deal.

    But if the Chinese GDP growth once again includes too much hot air due the mentioned infrastructure investments, then investors will hold back.

    Currently, there is an increasing risk that too much unhealthy infrastructure investments will offset the positive effect in the Chinese stock market should US and China find a way to a real termination of the trade war.