The number of road bridges in China has increased from 658,000 in 2010 to 851,000 last year. This development also well describes the overall infrastructure development in the country. Translated into the national account language, these are the significant and famous construction investments that have kept the GDP growth rate up for decades.
If one observes the development in the road bridge construction, the tendency has been that a fewer number of bridges is built per year since 2010. And now, the investments in infrastructure have been going on for so many years that China is lacking bridges to build.
At least those that make economically rational sense to construct, and the same applies for other infrastructure projects.
This year, the annual lending growth rate in China is also declining, where several economists point out that fewer loans for infrastructure investment are in demand. The financing is often done via special purpose vehicles in provincial or regional levels, where the profitability of the projects is also part of the equation; for example, a positive yield from the projects has an importance.
In parallel, I note that the annual real estate developers land sales in the provinces continue to decline, though the rate is still positive. There is no direct correlation between construction investments and sales of land, except that both are income generating due to the tolls from the roads, bridges, etc. However, I regard both developments as structural and long-term changes, which is why it has a major impact on China’s economy.
Exactly the same considerations apply to the infrastructure expansion in China. The country is huge and there are still countless places where infrastructure is lacking, but for example, the bridges that now remain to be built are less yielding, according to the above considerations.
I still expect infrastructure to be built in China, and some projects will make more sense than others. The same happens in many other countries, where the importance of the country’s GDP growth plays big a role. Though, if China tries to keep the GDP growth at the six percent mark based on unprofitable bridge constructions, then I consider it as negative.
China’s GDP growth is responding extremely fast to public infrastructure investments. So as early as this fourth quarter, it can already be revealed whether the government is choosing the worrying path of simply increasing its capital investment in infrastructure – or do it right.
In my opinion, one of the key points from the described development is that China’s economy is undergoing a structural change due to the change in the value of public infrastructure investments.
Another structural change that especially applies to the provinces is a risk to explore a slump in their revenue from the sale of land to property developers, however, I think the challenge has a longer time horizon. But most likely, this development will generate a downwards pressure on the revenue for the provinces for good. Therefore, I argue that this is also a structural change in the revenue base that occurs over time, and where a partial income/economic growth compensation must be found.
Several years ago, China’s leadership saw this development coming and tried a new growth path consisting of reforms combined with a greater focus on increasing private consumption. Some reforms have been good and have contributed to a more flexible economy, which in turn creates a better foundation for economic growth.
Yet, the reforms have not been significant landmark achievements, and I regard them as contributing to a long-term structural positive change. I pay extra attention to such possible developments during the next three months, but if nothing happens, investors will react negatively.
What’s certain is that reforms should not simply be small changes. Beijing must come up with exciting proposals to counteract the structural changes that are putting a sustained pressure on the GDP growth.