THE Tau Gamma Phi chapter at the Philippine College of Criminology is among several fraternity chapters still defying the Anti-Hazing Act of 2018. The mother chapter of this fraternity at UP Diliman has repeatedly told other chapters to follow the law. But this has been ignored by the UST, Adamson University and the PCCR chapters.
Officials of the UP Tau Gamma Alumni Association, led by the Founding Fathers of the nationwide brotherhood, would rather have these rebellious chapters leave the folds of the fraternity because of their continued violation of the Anti-Hazing Law.
‘The Quezon City police should file murder charges against those responsible for another utterly barbaric act of hazing and torture that claimed the life of Ahldryn Leary Bravante of PCCR.’
The Quezon City police should file murder charges against those responsible for another utterly barbaric act of hazing and torture that claimed the life of Ahldryn Leary Bravante of PCCR.
As a result of the latest hazing death, several alumni and resident brods of the Tau Gamma Phi are now seriously considering resigning from the “homicidal” fraternity that continues to be impugned by the blood and gore of the helpless and innocent.
***
From the Church of the Living Faith (CLF) at Malabon headed by Senior Pastor Alvin Carag and its missionary associates in Europe: “Same-sex marriage – Judgment of the Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, France. Unanimously, The World Court of Human Rights has established verbatim, that there is no right to same-sex marriage. The 47 judges from the 47 countries of the Council of Europe, which are members of the Plenary Court of Strasbourg (the most important human rights court in the world), published a statement of great relevance which has been surprisingly silenced by the progress of information and the field of influence.
“In fact, all 47 justices have unanimously endorsed the ruling that ‘there is no right to same-sex marriage.’ The sentence was based on a myriad of philosophical and anthropological considerations based on the natural order, common sense, scientific reports and, of course, positive law.
“In the latter case, in particular, the judgment was based on Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights. This also equates to treaty resolutions relating to human rights, in particular Articles 17 of the P. San Jose Act and 23 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
“In these historic resolutions, The Court decided that the notion of family contemplates not only ‘the traditional concept of marriage, that is, the union of man and a woman,’ but also that they should not be imposed on governments an obligation of open marriage to persons of the same sex.’ With regard to the principle of non-discrimination, the Court also added that there is no discrimination, since ‘states are free to reserve marriage only to heterosexual couples.’
“It is important and absolutely necessary to spread this kind of news because governments and supporters of homosexual lobbies do not want people to know about it. Obviously, most in the media are not interested in publicizing this information.”