LONDON – From higher-quality paint to state-of-the-art propellers: shipping companies are looking in every corner to reduce their carbon footprint as investor and activist pressure increases.
The move comes as aviation and shipping firms face demands to slash emissions due to their reliance on oil. The two sectors are expected to account for 40 percent of global CO2 output by 2050 unless action is taken, the European Environment Agency says.
International shipping accounts for 2.2 percent of global carbon dioxide emissions, according to the International Maritime Organization (IMO), more than aviation’s 2 percent share.
The IMO, a United Nations agency, has said it aims to halve greenhouse gas emissions from 2008 levels by 2050.
“Ships are long-life assets, typically up to 25 years, and if the industry is to meet the IMO target … then we need to accelerate the pace of change to greener vessels,” Stephen Fewster, Dutch bank ING’s global head of shipping, told Reuters.
A private initiative launched this year also means leading banks will change how they look at financing modern, more fuel-efficient ships at a time when the sector faces a capital shortfall estimated to be at least $20 billion.
While questions loom over whether shipping can meet its 2050 target without an overhaul of the types of cleaner fuel available and infrastructure, shipping firms are making individual efforts to change in a shake-up seen costing billions.
US agricultural group Cargill, one of the world’s biggest charterers of dry-bulk ships, has a target of reducing its CO2 output per cargo-ton-mile by 15 percent by 2020 from 2016 levels and has already cut it by more than 12 percent.
One measure taken is the use of higher-quality paints that give a smoother hull, meaning less energy is used on a voyage.
“If the industry would move from the standard paints to more sophisticated ones, and used in combination with other initiatives, this could have a real impact on decreasing emissions,” Jan Dieleman, president of Cargill’s ocean transportation business, told Reuters.
Emanuele Grimaldi, president and managing director of Italian shipping company Grimaldi Group, said apart from changing the paint that the firm uses, it has modified propellers for 30 of its ships.
To save fuel, Grimaldi has also introduced slower speeds when coming into port areas at night and increased the capacity of some of its fleet so each ship can take more cargo.
“These are lots of small things but if put all together they can make a difference,” he said, adding that the whole group had achieved an annual CO2 reduction of 300,000 tons.
The IMO has adopted mandatory rules for new vessels to boost fuel efficiency as a way of cutting CO2 from ship engines, but a final plan on these is not expected until 2023.
In September, an initiative was launched to get zero-carbon ships and fuels on the water by 2030.
In a report this June, CDP (formerly known as the Carbon Disclosure Project) ranked NYK Line, Maersk and Mitsui OSK Lines 9104.T as the three shipping companies most prepared for a low-carbon transition, out of 18 of the largest publicly listed shipping firms.
Maersk, the world’s biggest container line, aims to be carbon neutral by 2050, and has spent $1 billion over the last four years retrofitting around 150 vessels.
“Such measures will represent a small fraction of the overall capex expenditure required to meet the IMO’s target,” a spokesman for CDP, a not-for-profit organization, said.
A report by the Energy Transition Commission, a panel of global experts, last year estimated that a fully decarbonized shipping industry could cost less than 0.2 percent of gross domestic product in 2050, or below $600 billion a year.
This compares with less than 0.13 percent of GDP or under $500 billion per year for a fully decarbonized aviation sector.
“Maersk’s target is a big deal. There isn’t an aviation company in the world close to making that sort of commitment,” — Reuters
