JACKSON HOLE, Wyoming- No safer than a bund. Or a gilt. Or an OAT.
Long touted as hands-down the world’s “safe haven” securities, the behavior of US Treasuries during and after the COVID-19 pandemic calls that label into question, suggesting they are little different from the debt issued by the likes of Germany, Britain, France, or even big corporations.
That’s the key finding of new research presented at the Kansas City Fed’s annual research conference in Jackson Hole, Wyoming. It examines a shift in investor behavior in that period that raises questions about the “exorbitant privilege” the US government has long enjoyed to borrow broadly on the global market even as federal budget gaps grow ever wider.
It’s a timely question given growing deficits are seen as a near certainty regardless of who becomes the next US president.
New York University’s Roberto Gomez-Cram, London Business School’s Howard Kung and Stanford University’s Hanno Lustig also throw into question the assertion that the Treasury market was dysfunctional in that period – as asserted by the Federal Reserve when it launched its massive bond buying – or just rationally pricing the risk of a massive unfunded spending shock then being prepared in response to the health emergency.
“In response to COVID, US Treasury investors seem to have shifted to the risky debt model when pricing Treasurys,” wrote New York University’s Roberto Gomez-Cram, London Business School’s Howard Kung and Stanford University’s Hanno Lustig in the paper.
“Policymakers, including central banks, should internalize this shift when assessing whether bond markets are functioning properly.”