SATURDAY |OCTOBER 04, 2008 | PHILIPPINES

ABOUT US | SUBSCRIBE | WRITE US | ADVERTISE | ARCHIVES

 

Ombudsman opposes own prosecutor’s motion at Sandigan


TALK about getting stabbed in the back. And by your own boss too.

Ombudsman Ma. Merceditas Gutierrez has opposed a motion filed by Special Prosecutor Dennis Villa-Ignacio seeking the inhibition of Associate Justice Gregory Ong, chairman of the Sandiganbayan Fourth Division, from the trial of 148 cases involving alleged fraud in the issuance of tax credit certificates (TCC) amounting to billions of pesos.

Villa-Ignacio cited his personal differences with Ong as ground for his motion, saying the magistrate might harbor bias against him after he raised questions on Ong’s impartiality and citizenship before the Supreme Court

But in a seven-page comment filed last Sept. 26, Gutierrez said "it is the position of the Office of the Ombudsman that the incumbency status of Hon. Gregory S. Ong as Associate Justice of the Sandiganbayan must be accorded due respect rather than be doubted."

This despite the fact that it was the Ombudsman herself who appointed Villa-Ignacio as lead counsel to prosecute the TCC scam cases in her Office Order No. 72 dated July 10, 2008. Also appointed as members of the Villa-Ignacio’s team are Assistant Special Prosecutors Rohemia J. Jamsani-Rodriguez, Ma. Hazelina A. Tujan-Militante, Jennifer A. Agustin-Se, Agnes B. Autencio-Daquis, Mariter Delfin-Santos and Roland B. Galvan.

In her comment, Gutierrez stressed that her office does not support Villa-Ignacio’s stand that there is sufficient basis to ask Ong to recuse himself. "The motion for inhibition… filed by the special panel exclusively pertains to such panel without the imprimatur of the Office of the Ombudsman and as such remains their personal position and definitely not the position of the Office of the Ombudsman."

The Ombudsman filed the comment in compliance with an order from the Fourth Division.

Curiously, Gutierrez furnished 11 parties in the case copies of her comment but not the Office of the Special Prosecutor.

A petition filed by the Villa-Ignacio and Prosecutor Wendel Barreras-Sulit in 2004 resulted in a directive from the Supreme Court ordering Ong to recuse himself from participating in the trial of 10 graft cases against former First Lady Imelda Marcos.

On July 20, 2007, the special prosecutor also asked the Supreme Court to enjoin Ong from discharging the functions and duties of a Sandiganbayan Associate Justice while there were still unresolved issues about the latter’s citizenship as raised by Kilosbayan and Bantay Katarungan Foundations.

Under the internal rules of the Sandiganbayan, a justice from another division would be appointed to sit in lieu of a division member who inhibits himself. But if it is the division chairman who recuses himself, the case or cases would have to re-raffled to any of the other four divisions. – Peter J.G. Tabingo

 


     METRO NEWS

Ombudsman opposes own prosecutor’s motion at Sandigan

AFP reactivates office that will focus on troops’ training

DAR has made full accounting of recovered Marcos funds, says Pangandaman

Marayag assumes office as Navy No. 2


     TOP NEWS

Markets fall ahead of US bailout vote

2 China-made products found tainted; 28 cleared

SC to Senate: What’s status of ‘Joc Joc’ case?

Gloria: Higher tax take will help ride out crisis

House minority seeks P200B cut in budget

Mar presses full-year tax break for minimum wage earners

Palace shrugs off taunting by Kato




Please address comments and suggestions to the Webmaster.
COPYRIGHT 2004 © People's Independent Media Inc.