e had a very
interest-ing and pleasant inter-action last Thursday noon with Dr. David Plotke,
a political scientist from the United States. Eight columnists from different
broadsheets were invited by the Public Affairs office of the US Embassy to ask
questions regarding the tight presidential contest that should culminate on the
first Tuesday of November. Some three weeks before, we were also invited to a
tele-conference with another political science professor, but that encounter was
spoiled by inane questions fielded by of all people, a Comelec commissioner who
kept asking a clueless American professor about the crazy situation of
Philippine elections. The American must have wondered in bewilderment if
elections in their true sense really happen in these benighted parts.
Of course we know that our elections are far from being fair
or clean or democratic, but it made me cringe in shame that we had a
commissioner who thought he was addressing Virgilio Garcillano and Roque Bello
instead of a political expert from a country where democracy is real and voters
make informed choices. The kind of characters an illegitimate president has
appointed to the Comelec fortifies my belief that she has no real desire for any
kind of honorable legacy.
Dr. Plotke started by saying that McCain was probably the
best choice the Republicans could make, given a field of contenders which
included far-right, or far too conservative candidates that would not attract
any independent voters. He narrowed down the swing-vote states to Michigan,
Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida and Nevada. Most of the other states have
predictably fallen behind one or the other party and candidate this early.
Had the US Senate not approved the 700 billion dollar bailout
package for the ailing financial market, Obama would already be a sure winner,
Dr. Plotke said. This is not to say that the pendulum has swung towards McCain.
It simply means that he cannot be written off this early. In any case, the vote
margin should be some 3 to 5 percent close if Obama prevails, and less if McCain
squeaks in. The latest polls, taken after Bush announced the bailout package
proposed by US Treasury Secretary Paulson and the Federal Reserve Board’s
Bernanke, and before the Biden-Palin debate, showed Obama seven points ahead of
rival McCain. If Obama gets Pennsylvania, Ohio and Michigan, he is already a
winner. McCain has to get these three swing states, and more, including Florida,
where Bush narrowly beat, and quite controversially, Al Gore eight years ago.
With a month to go, a seven-point lead could be erased only
by monumental blunders on the part of the Democrats and their Obama. Although
much attention has been drawn to the vice-presidential race, principally because
of the novelty of Sarah Palin, in truth, Americans don’t vote separately for
their vice-presidents, unlike in our stupid system. And the vice-presidential
candidates’ influence, plus or minus, push or pull, on the presidential
candidate is really rather small, a max, according to Dr. Plotke, of 5 percent.
Thus, as we observed in our "Lemons" article last Thursday, a sweet-smelling
Palin gave McCain a 4 to 5 percent boost in the ratings, right after she was
introduced in the Republican convention. Now let’s see how Palin’s "substance"
compares with Joe Biden. (As of this writing, I had not yet seen their televised
debate.)
There are two major issues where Obama and McCain will be
weighed by the voters of America. One is the economy. And while McCain is not an
economic conservative, he represents a political party dominated by
conservatives. The fact that their dogma of unbridled free market economics and
a social philosophy of "trickle-down", best enunciated by Ronald Reagan a
generation ago, has unravelled makes it more difficult for John McCain to
convince worried Americans that their future is brighter under a
McCain-Republican leadership. The Democrats just have to reason to death that
the collapse of Wall Street happened under the Republican watch, and they have
to paint the tar on McCain.
Contrarily, Obama has been spouting the advocacies that touch
an emotional response in times of dire straits. His passion for universal health
care and for education are not so much motherhood, as they are basic needs that
the middle-class and the poor desire and believe they deserve.
The other is foreign policy. While McCain sustains the Bush
administration on this, Obama has been forthright about ending the military
engagement in Iraq. Obama just has to balance off the worries of international
terrorism consistently bannered by the neo-cons in the Bush-Cheney
maladministration, as against the average American’s aversion to huge military
spending to prop its government’s penchant for being constable of the universe.
I expressed concern about the effects on Obama of say, a crazy attack by Iran’s
Ahmadinejad on say, Israel a week or so before E-Day, and Dr. Plotke
acknowledged this as a negative against Obama’s gaining bandwagon. However he
says Obama has been very wise in expressing his open support for Israel, and
this has fortified the Jewish faith in the Democratic Party to which they have
historically been in support.
Racism is of course a continuing undercurrent, but Dr. Plotke
says this is perhaps minimal, considering that America has become increasingly
multi-racial, and the states where such racist tendencies still exist have
already been counted this early to the Republicans’ account. Remember that the
American electoral system, unlike ours, is not a question of absolute numerical
advantage, but winning 270 electoral votes in the electoral college, based on a
winner-take-all state victory. Thus small Connecticut will always vote Democrat
and so will huge New York, just as Kentucky and Texas are on the Republican
counter.
The beauty of the American system of presidential choice lies
in the transparency by which issues of fitness, issues of character, as much as
defining positions on genuine issues, are debated over and over again a full
year before voters make their decision.
Every candidate’s life becomes an open book, and by this I
mean as much his religious convictions or zealotry, his marital fidelity as much
as his peccadilloes, his business dealings and his voting record in Congress or
his performance or lack of the same in state or local administration.
And while so-called political handlers and their army of
creative people can churn out ads to highlight the good and try to paper over
the bad, in the end, people get to see through the blather. And make informed
choices, for better or for worse.
Which is why I recommended in two successive articles on this
space early this year that would-be presidential moist-eyes should be subjected
as early as possible to rigorous examination, through debates and other fora
which would show their fitness for the highest position in the land of the
benighted. Will they, by conviction, principle and character, bring light, or
will they just plunge us deeper into the benighted state we have been plunged
into through all these years?
Let us begin the winnowing process. Dismiss the chaff and
limit our choices to the true grain.