March 18, 2018, 6:28 am
Facebook iconTwitter iconYouTube iconGoogle+ icon
1 Philippine Peso = 0.07065 UAE Dirham
1 Philippine Peso = 2.03925 Albanian Lek
1 Philippine Peso = 0.03424 Neth Antilles Guilder
1 Philippine Peso = 0.38878 Argentine Peso
1 Philippine Peso = 0.02441 Australian Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.03424 Aruba Florin
1 Philippine Peso = 0.03848 Barbados Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 1.59465 Bangladesh Taka
1 Philippine Peso = 0.03042 Bulgarian Lev
1 Philippine Peso = 0.00725 Bahraini Dinar
1 Philippine Peso = 33.68565 Burundi Franc
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01924 Bermuda Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.02513 Brunei Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.13197 Bolivian Boliviano
1 Philippine Peso = 0.06274 Brazilian Real
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01924 Bahamian Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 1.24856 Bhutan Ngultrum
1 Philippine Peso = 0.1833 Botswana Pula
1 Philippine Peso = 385.14813 Belarus Ruble
1 Philippine Peso = 0.03843 Belize Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.02492 Canadian Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01817 Swiss Franc
1 Philippine Peso = 11.56676 Chilean Peso
1 Philippine Peso = 0.12147 Chinese Yuan
1 Philippine Peso = 54.65564 Colombian Peso
1 Philippine Peso = 10.85764 Costa Rica Colon
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01924 Cuban Peso
1 Philippine Peso = 1.71451 Cape Verde Escudo
1 Philippine Peso = 0.3954 Czech Koruna
1 Philippine Peso = 3.40189 Djibouti Franc
1 Philippine Peso = 0.11583 Danish Krone
1 Philippine Peso = 0.95768 Dominican Peso
1 Philippine Peso = 2.18536 Algerian Dinar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.24322 Estonian Kroon
1 Philippine Peso = 0.3384 Egyptian Pound
1 Philippine Peso = 0.52366 Ethiopian Birr
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01554 Euro
1 Philippine Peso = 0.03857 Fiji Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01376 Falkland Islands Pound
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01377 British Pound
1 Philippine Peso = 0.08486 Ghanaian Cedi
1 Philippine Peso = 0.90092 Gambian Dalasi
1 Philippine Peso = 173.16275 Guinea Franc
1 Philippine Peso = 0.14113 Guatemala Quetzal
1 Philippine Peso = 3.94498 Guyana Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.15083 Hong Kong Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.45346 Honduras Lempira
1 Philippine Peso = 0.11564 Croatian Kuna
1 Philippine Peso = 1.22816 Haiti Gourde
1 Philippine Peso = 4.83821 Hungarian Forint
1 Philippine Peso = 264.23624 Indonesian Rupiah
1 Philippine Peso = 0.06596 Israeli Shekel
1 Philippine Peso = 1.24719 Indian Rupee
1 Philippine Peso = 22.77799 Iraqi Dinar
1 Philippine Peso = 725.18276 Iran Rial
1 Philippine Peso = 1.91035 Iceland Krona
1 Philippine Peso = 2.45864 Jamaican Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01361 Jordanian Dinar
1 Philippine Peso = 2.04381 Japanese Yen
1 Philippine Peso = 1.94402 Kenyan Shilling
1 Philippine Peso = 1.31156 Kyrgyzstan Som
1 Philippine Peso = 76.64486 Cambodia Riel
1 Philippine Peso = 7.62813 Comoros Franc
1 Philippine Peso = 17.31435 North Korean Won
1 Philippine Peso = 20.43921 Korean Won
1 Philippine Peso = 0.00577 Kuwaiti Dinar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01578 Cayman Islands Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 6.19392 Kazakhstan Tenge
1 Philippine Peso = 159.13813 Lao Kip
1 Philippine Peso = 28.96306 Lebanese Pound
1 Philippine Peso = 2.99731 Sri Lanka Rupee
1 Philippine Peso = 2.51808 Liberian Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.22701 Lesotho Loti
1 Philippine Peso = 0.05865 Lithuanian Lita
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01194 Latvian Lat
1 Philippine Peso = 0.02549 Libyan Dinar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.17605 Moroccan Dirham
1 Philippine Peso = 0.31722 Moldovan Leu
1 Philippine Peso = 0.9521 Macedonian Denar
1 Philippine Peso = 25.75991 Myanmar Kyat
1 Philippine Peso = 45.95998 Mongolian Tugrik
1 Philippine Peso = 0.15526 Macau Pataca
1 Philippine Peso = 6.7526 Mauritania Ougulya
1 Philippine Peso = 0.6314 Mauritius Rupee
1 Philippine Peso = 0.29954 Maldives Rufiyaa
1 Philippine Peso = 13.72489 Malawi Kwacha
1 Philippine Peso = 0.35769 Mexican Peso
1 Philippine Peso = 0.07511 Malaysian Ringgit
1 Philippine Peso = 0.22628 Namibian Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 6.86803 Nigerian Naira
1 Philippine Peso = 0.5935 Nicaragua Cordoba
1 Philippine Peso = 0.14867 Norwegian Krone
1 Philippine Peso = 1.99584 Nepalese Rupee
1 Philippine Peso = 0.0263 New Zealand Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.0074 Omani Rial
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01924 Panama Balboa
1 Philippine Peso = 0.0625 Peruvian Nuevo Sol
1 Philippine Peso = 0.0606 Papua New Guinea Kina
1 Philippine Peso = 1 Philippine Peso
1 Philippine Peso = 2.12524 Pakistani Rupee
1 Philippine Peso = 0.0653 Polish Zloty
1 Philippine Peso = 105.73297 Paraguayan Guarani
1 Philippine Peso = 0.07002 Qatar Rial
1 Philippine Peso = 0.07245 Romanian New Leu
1 Philippine Peso = 1.09698 Russian Rouble
1 Philippine Peso = 16.21431 Rwanda Franc
1 Philippine Peso = 0.07214 Saudi Arabian Riyal
1 Philippine Peso = 0.14897 Solomon Islands Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.25735 Seychelles Rupee
1 Philippine Peso = 0.34725 Sudanese Pound
1 Philippine Peso = 0.15738 Swedish Krona
1 Philippine Peso = 0.02519 Singapore Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01377 St Helena Pound
1 Philippine Peso = 0.4272 Slovak Koruna
1 Philippine Peso = 146.78723 Sierra Leone Leone
1 Philippine Peso = 10.96576 Somali Shilling
1 Philippine Peso = 380.96766 Sao Tome Dobra
1 Philippine Peso = 0.16833 El Salvador Colon
1 Philippine Peso = 9.90727 Syrian Pound
1 Philippine Peso = 0.22641 Swaziland Lilageni
1 Philippine Peso = 0.59908 Thai Baht
1 Philippine Peso = 0.04615 Tunisian Dinar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.04292 Tongan paʻanga
1 Philippine Peso = 0.07466 Turkish Lira
1 Philippine Peso = 0.13004 Trinidad Tobago Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.56124 Taiwan Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 43.40131 Tanzanian Shilling
1 Philippine Peso = 0.50135 Ukraine Hryvnia
1 Philippine Peso = 70.1616 Ugandan Shilling
1 Philippine Peso = 0.01924 United States Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 0.54386 Uruguayan New Peso
1 Philippine Peso = 156.42555 Uzbekistan Sum
1 Philippine Peso = 703.30896 Venezuelan Bolivar
1 Philippine Peso = 437.93767 Vietnam Dong
1 Philippine Peso = 1.99827 Vanuatu Vatu
1 Philippine Peso = 0.04836 Samoa Tala
1 Philippine Peso = 10.18969 CFA Franc (BEAC)
1 Philippine Peso = 0.05194 East Caribbean Dollar
1 Philippine Peso = 10.18969 CFA Franc (BCEAO)
1 Philippine Peso = 1.85379 Pacific Franc
1 Philippine Peso = 4.80666 Yemen Riyal
1 Philippine Peso = 0.22646 South African Rand
1 Philippine Peso = 99.83648 Zambian Kwacha
1 Philippine Peso = 6.96229 Zimbabwe dollar

Tourism growth bests regional, global numbers

A GREATER support, awareness and appreciation for tourism initiatives, not only by the government but Filipinos themselves, have shaped the unprecedented growth of the industry for the last five years despite a multitude of problems.

Stronger support from both the public and private sector, backed up by both larger inputs in tourism investments and budget, have been key in advancing tourism under the Aquino administration, the Department of Tourism (DOT) said.

Under President Aquino’s watch, the Philippine tourism industry has bested regional and even global growth regardless of all the controversies and problems since 2010, according to Benito Bengzon, DOT undersecretary for tourism planning.

The compounded annual growth of the local tourism industry for 2010-2015 was pegged at about 8.25 percent. 

“This average is better than what most Asian countries recorded, definitely what we experienced for global. This tells us that despite all the problems that have come our way we have come up with a strategy that has insulated our industry from all the negative effects of the recent incidents,” he said.

At the forefront of these problems earlier faced by the DOT was how to handle the image building strategy of the tourism industry.

“In the early years one of the problems that we faced was creating a higher awareness for the Philippines. How to build the country’s image,” said Bengzon.

And luckily for the government tourism agency, the answer came in 2012 with the birth of the “It’s More Fun in the Philippines” campaign.

“The turnaround point was It’s More Fun in the Philippines, which was in January 2012. That was when we were taken more seriously. It is manifested in a way that the government started allocating an increasingly larger share of national budget for tourism,” he said.

The campaign merited the support of the locals and government, which made the way for the growing budget of the DOT for marketing and promotional initiatives.

For example, the budget for the Tourism and Promotions Board (TPB), the marketing arm of the DOT, has increased by six-fold in less than six years.

From P65-million in 2010, when it was still the Philippine Convention and Visitors Convention, it has grown to a current budget of P500-million.

“This administration has given tourism more support than we have ever seen. This is shown in the budget allocation,” Bengzon added.

The budget of the agencies and divisions under the DOT   Secretary more than doubled since 2009, from P1.618-billion to an estimated P3.6-billion this year.

The private sector has also increased its investments to develop tourism. Endorsed projects of the DOT to the Board and Investments (BOI) and Philippine Economic Zone Authority (PEZA) reached P160-billion in 2015.

A total of 128 tourism projects were approved to be eligible to avail incentives , which include income tax holidays and employment of foreign nations, from the two investment agencies, according to official data from the DOT. 

However, more concrete issues have since been haunting the tourism industry, particularly problems on overcoming overall safety and security concerns of foreign visitors.

For example, several issues, from the 2010 Manila hostage to the still on-going territorial disputes, have dampened the country’s relationship with the Asian behemoth, China.

On and off travel advisories from Beijing since the start of the administration, have led to the gradual decline of the number of Chinese tourists visiting the country. 

This is seen as a major blow to the local tourism industry as China is among the top five source markets of the country. 

Recent controversies, like the Samal Kidnapping and the “Tanim-Bala” incidents last year, also hampered the growth of the industry.

Still, the DOT said no major negative impact on the flow of international tourists was felt despite all the security concerns.

“This tells us that despite all the problems that have come our way we have come up with a strategy that has insulated our industry from all the negative effects of the recent incidents.” Bengzon said.

This strategy has been to strengthen The DOT’s public relations offensive actions to mitigate the effects of these issues which they cannot control. 

“We have a well-crafted strategy to make sure that we don’t completely fall down when we experience challenges along the way,” Bengzon said. “(It is about) a strategy in terms of negative news counter with our own PR offensive through familiarization tours for agents and media. It is singing louder than the noise. The negative news we cannot wipe out really, but it is about generating positive news.”


To ensure that the tourism industry is continually growing despite the decline in some markets, like the incident with China, the DOT said it is imperative that new source markets should offset the visitor decrease.

This was done through the setting up of a market and development group, now seen as a key support program under the Aquino administration, headed by DOT Secretary Ramon Jimenez.

“This group is responsible for expanding the market base by identifying new markets, whether they are geographic markets or segments,” said Bengzon.

Currently, the group is looking at growing visitor arrivals from the Southeast Asian region and the Scandinavian block, according to Verna Covar-Buensuceso, officer in charge of the market development group.

The DOT is looking to grow visitor arrivals from Indonesia, Thailand, and Russia, as well as Norway and Denmark.

These markets are seen to have double-digit increases in around three to five years, as the DOT is currently in talks with the private sector to formulate a marketing plan and strategy to help attract tourists to the country.

“Right now these markets are not producing big numbers yet. Less than 100,000 visitors, but in terms of generation capacity, it is very good for us because they stay for long periods of time” Buensuceso said. 

Crafting tourism programs to cater to the specific needs of the visitors is key to growing these markets, especially for high-yield markets like those in South Africa, Middle East and Mediterranean Europe.

“We are looking at the potential of these growing markets. We have to look at the ‘winability’ of the market and match it with the products here in the country,” she said. 

But more than tourism strategy development, improving air connectivity to these potential markets should first be prioritized by stakeholders as ensuring seamless air connectivity is seen as one of the pillars which support the tourism industry.

One priority program that the administration took to guarantee smoother air connectivity is opening up the secondary gateways of the country to mitigate congestion in Manila.

“Strategically what is important now is to disperse the traffic to more gateways. It achieves many objectives: one in a way it helps to decongest our primary gateway, but more importantly it also now allows us to promote more aggressively the secondary destinations and bring economic activity to far more communities,” Bengzon said.

The development of more points of entry, for both commercial and charter flights, has been crucial to the growth of the industry.

Charter flights, for one, was able to grow by 20-25 percent in 2015 with a total of 230,958 available seats, mostly flights to secondary destinations like Legazpi, Bacolodo, and Kalibo, according to Erwin Balane, head of the DOT route development team.

“The development of Kalibo for example, one of the major points of entry for charter flights was realized during the term of President Aquino. We’re talking about an airport that wasn’t exactly sleepy but relatively small in terms of passengers, but is now getting more in terms of percentage,” added Bengzon. 

The Kalibo airport saw an estimated 411,000 passengers in 2014, contributing about 8.5 percent to total inbound traffic.

“We will see that the Movement is not just into manila, but it is starting to be dispersed. It is all very deliberate in our strategy to position the Philippines as a multiple destination country,” Bengzon said.

Local stakeholder empowerment

Empowering local executives and stakeholders is also part of the backbone that has supported the local tourism industry in the last five years, added Bengzon.

Equipping government and tourist officials with the necessary tools in tourism planning and development has fostered a greater awareness in the people directly involved in the industry.

Convergence programs with other government agencies, like the Department of Interior and Local Government and the Department of Social Welfare and Development, empowered the public sector to develop their own sustainable tourism plans for their communities.

“With these convergence programs, we train and empower local communities and give them livelihood opportunities which in effect they become a part of the tourism value chain,” said Bengzon.

This support for local government units (LGUs) will likely ensure a more seamless travel experience for tourists all over the country, according to Aileen Clement, president of the Asean Tourism Association.

“The support is there, it is a lot of mindset change that is most significant. It is not just the DOT that needs to understand what the tourism industry is about. And they did a very good campaign for everyone, including the private sector, LGUs and other government units, on what tourism is about. It is not just about a hotel, waterfall or road network, but a combination of these that provide a seamless travel experience that defines tourism,” she said.
No votes yet

Column of the Day

The tragedy of Dengvaxia

By DAHLI ASPILLERA | March 16,2018
‘Blood test is mandatory, Dr. Halstead told Sanofi in 2016: “I was quite astonished and upset that this mass immunization is going forward.” Without the blood test.’

Opinion of the Day

Duterte is mistaken

By ELLEN TORDESILLAS | March 16, 2018
‘There is no unilateral constitutional authority to withdraw from the Rome Statute of the ICC.’